ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
The potential of Nutri-Score to discriminate foods according to environmental impact.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNutri-Score aims to aid consumers in making informed food choices based on nutritional quality. To guide consumers regarding both the nutritional quality and environmental impact of foods, it would be beneficial when Nutri-Score could also discriminate foods by environmental impact. This study investigated the association of Nutri-Score with the environmental impact indicators greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and blue water consumption.
methodsNutri-Score classifications were calculated for generic foods of the Dutch Food Composition Database, combined with GHG emissions (kg CO
resultsNutri-Score (final score) correlated significantly with GHG emissions for general foods (r = 0.29), added fats, nuts and seeds (r = 0.25), and negatively with blue water consumption for added fats, nuts and seeds (r=-0.51). Saturated fatty acids and protein were significantly correlated with GHG emissions (r = 0.52 and r = 0.43) for general foods, and some general food groups with GHG emissions and blue water consumption, namely bread (r = 0.60 and r = 0.53) and savoury sauces (r = 0.52 and r = 0.53).
conclusionCurrently, Nutri-Score's ability to discriminate foods according to environmental impact is limited. To use Front-of-Pack labeling to guide consumers on both nutritional quality and environmental impact, exploration of revisions to Nutri-Score or the use of additional tools is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.