Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2025
Development and evaluation of an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for managing intraoperative hypotension.
Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- To the Editor in response to the comments by Jayaswal et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comments on "Development and evaluation of an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower-limit control for managing intraoperative hypotension" by Nagata et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Automated hemodynamic management system for the prevention of hypotension and cardiac output reduction during general anesthesia: preclinical experimental validation.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor in response to comments by Kodaira et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Letter to the article by Nagata et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- The Development of an Automated Fluid Infusion Management System to Prevent Hypotension During General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Automated Vasopressor Administration Algorithms Using Lower-Limit Control for Intraoperative Hypotension: A Simulation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for the management of intraoperative hypotension, assessing its efficacy in maintaining adequate blood pressure levels.
methodsTwenty patients undergoing surgery with anticipated blood pressure fluctuations were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) was measured at 2.5-min intervals using an upper arm cuff. In the automated group, phenylephrine administration was governed by an automated system that delivered bolus doses and adjusted the continuous infusion rate when mean blood pressure (MBP) dropped below 65 mmHg. In the manual group, phenylephrine administration was initiated by the attending anesthesiologist under the same MBP threshold. Propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium were administered via the automated delivery system for total intravenous anesthesia, to minimize hemodynamic variability between groups. The primary end point was the percentage of time during which MBP remained above 65 mmHg and systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg, measured from the initiation to the cessation of intravenous anesthesia and assessed using a non-inferiority test.
resultsThe automated group adequately maintained blood pressure within the target range for 84.53% of the time, compared to 72.45% in the manual group, confirming statistical non-inferiority (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis system effectively managed intraoperative hypotension using intermittent NIBP measurements, which are more feasible in clinical practice. Despite relying on less frequent and lower-resolution blood pressure data, it demonstrated efficacy comparable to anesthesiologist-led management, indicating its potential for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.