Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072565›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2025

Development and evaluation of an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for managing intraoperative hypotension.

Osamu Nagata, Emi Morinushi, Aya Kuroyanagi, Fumiyo Yasuma

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Letter to the article by Nagata et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Osamu NagataDepartment of Anesthesia, Touto Kasukabe Hospital, 652-7 Ohata, Kasukabe, Saitama, 344-0022, Japan. o-nagata@fa2.so-net.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2988-8977
Emi MorinushiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Aya KuroyanagiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Saitama Cooperative Hospital, 1317 Kizoro, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 333-0831, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9782-6870
Fumiyo YasumaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8529-2974

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 24hk0102081National Center for Global Health and Medicine 21A1016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate an automated phenylephrine delivery system by lower limit control for the management of intraoperative hypotension, assessing its efficacy in maintaining adequate blood pressure levels.

methodsTwenty patients undergoing surgery with anticipated blood pressure fluctuations were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) was measured at 2.5-min intervals using an upper arm cuff. In the automated group, phenylephrine administration was governed by an automated system that delivered bolus doses and adjusted the continuous infusion rate when mean blood pressure (MBP) dropped below 65 mmHg. In the manual group, phenylephrine administration was initiated by the attending anesthesiologist under the same MBP threshold. Propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium were administered via the automated delivery system for total intravenous anesthesia, to minimize hemodynamic variability between groups. The primary end point was the percentage of time during which MBP remained above 65 mmHg and systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg, measured from the initiation to the cessation of intravenous anesthesia and assessed using a non-inferiority test.

resultsThe automated group adequately maintained blood pressure within the target range for 84.53% of the time, compared to 72.45% in the manual group, confirming statistical non-inferiority (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis system effectively managed intraoperative hypotension using intermittent NIBP measurements, which are more feasible in clinical practice. Despite relying on less frequent and lower-resolution blood pressure data, it demonstrated efficacy comparable to anesthesiologist-led management, indicating its potential for broader clinical application.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsHypotensionIntraoperative ComplicationsPhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAdultAgedAutomationBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAutomated drug delivery systemIntraoperative hypotensionLower limit controlNoninvasive blood pressure measurementPhenylephrine

Identifiers

PMID40072565
PMCPMC12103478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.