ArticleDermatology reports2025
Survey of the impact of BOLT-trial data on oncologists' and dermatologists' decision-making in treating patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor in white populations. Multiple studies demonstrated that the aberrant activation of Hedgehog signaling is a driver of BCC development, and its blockade represents a potential therapeutic target. In Italy, clinicians can prescribe Hedgehog inhibitors (HhIs) vismodegib and sonidegib. To highlight the treatment choice of clinicians, we conducted an online survey between November 1 and November 18, 2020, with 33 Italian clinicians from 27 reference hospitals, in which each participant received an anonymous survey consisting of two multiple-choice questions on the clinical efficacy and safety profile of sonidegib and vismodegib. Respondents reported their opinions on which efficacy and tolerability data of the pivotal phase-II BOLT trial were more relevant in patients' treatment choices with locally advanced BCC (laBCC). This survey shows that the overall response rate (ORR) and the duration of response (DoR) are the most expected across dermatologists and oncologists. The different pharmacokinetic profiles of the two HhIs are behind their diverse toxicity spectrum; dose and schedule modification seem to address the choice between vismodegib and sonidegib among dermato-oncology prescribers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.