Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072446›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Corneal Keratocytes, Fibroblasts, and Myofibroblasts Exhibit Distinct Transcriptional Profiles In Vitro.

Kara Poole, Krithika S Iyer, David W Schmidtke, W Matthew Petroll, Victor D Varner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kara PooleDepartment of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Krithika S IyerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States.
David W SchmidtkeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States.
W Matthew PetrollDepartment of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Victor D VarnerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States.

Funding

Assessment of Corneal Fibroblast Biomechanical BehaviorR01EY013322 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PETROLL, W MATTHEW · 2001 to 2025
$9.0M
Stem Cell, Organoid and Cell Phenotyping ModuleP30EY030413 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI W MATTHEW PETROLL · 2019 to 2026
$5.9M
Regulation of Corneal Keratocyte Differentiation through the Integration of Biochemical, Biomechanical and Topographic CuesR01EY030190 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI SCHMIDTKE, DAVID W · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY030413NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013322NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: After stromal injury to the cornea, the release of growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines promotes the activation of quiescent keratocytes into a migratory fibroblast and/or fibrotic myofibroblast phenotype. Persistence of the myofibroblast phenotype can lead to corneal fibrosis and scarring, which are leading causes of blindness worldwide. This study aims to establish comprehensive transcriptional profiles for cultured corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts to gain insights into the mechanisms through which these phenotypic changes occur. Methods: Primary rabbit corneal keratocytes were cultured in either defined serum-free (SF) media, fetal bovine serum (FBS) containing media, or SF media supplemented with TGF-β1 to induce keratocyte, fibroblast, or myofibroblast phenotypes, respectively. Bulk RNA sequencing followed by bioinformatic analyses was performed to identify significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and enriched biological pathways for each phenotype. Results: Genes commonly associated with keratocytes, fibroblasts, or myofibroblasts showed high relative expression in SF, FBS, or TGF-β1 culture conditions, respectively. Differential expression and functional analyses revealed novel DEGs for each cell type, as well as enriched pathways indicative of differences in proliferation, apoptosis, extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, cell-ECM interactions, cytokine signaling, and cell mechanics. Conclusions: Overall, these data demonstrate distinct transcriptional differences among cultured corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts. We have identified genes and signaling pathways that may play important roles in keratocyte differentiation, including many related to mechanotransduction and ECM biology. Our findings have revealed novel molecular markers for each cell type, as well as possible targets for modulating cell behavior and promoting physiological corneal wound healing.

Indexed as

Corneal KeratocytesFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationMyofibroblastsTranscriptomeAnimalsCells, CulturedCorneal StromaGene Expression ProfilingRabbitsTransforming Growth Factor beta1Transforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID40072446
PMCPMC11918030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.