Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072439›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2025

Nicotine Exposure From Smoking Tobacco and Vaping Among Adolescents.

David Hammond, Jessica L Reid, Maciej L Goniewicz, Ann McNeill, Richard J O'Connor, Danielle Corsetti, Ashleigh C Block, Leonie S Brose, Deborah Robson

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers of Toxicant Exposure among Youth in Canada, England, and the United States Who Vape and/or Smoke Tobacco or Do Neither.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica L ReidSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Maciej L GoniewiczDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Ann McNeillDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard J O'ConnorDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Danielle CorsettiSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Ashleigh C BlockDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Leonie S BroseDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Deborah RobsonDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It remains unknown whether nicotine intake among youths who vape is lower, comparable, or higher than among youths who smoke. Objective: To examine potential differences in biomarkers of exposure to nicotine (1) between adolescents who smoke tobacco, vape, both vape and smoke (dual use), or do not use; (2) between adolescents in 3 countries; and (3) by nicotine content and form in the vaping product last used among adolescents who exclusively vaped. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, observational cross-sectional study invited adolescents aged 16 to 19 years in Canada, England, and the US who had previously completed national surveys to participate in a biomarker study based on their vaping and smoking status. Participants completed questionnaires and self-collected urine samples between September 2019 and January 2022. Analyses were conducted in February 2023 and between January and June 2024. Exposures: Vaping, tobacco smoking, dual use, or no use in the past 7 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Urine concentration of cotinine, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine (3OH-cotinine), and total nicotine equivalents (TNE-2; molar sum of cotinine and 3OH-cotinine), normalized for creatinine concentration. Results: Among the 364 participants (mean [SD] age, 17.6 [1.1] years; 203 females [55.8%]) who provided usable urine samples and completed questionnaires, no differences in TNE-2 concentration were observed between adolescents who exclusively vaped (n = 73; geometric mean [SD], 3.10 [16.69] nmol/mg creatinine), exclusively smoked (n = 68; geometric mean [SD], 3.78 [18.00] nmol/mg creatinine), or both vaped and smoked (n = 77; geometric mean [SD], 6.07 [19.08] nmol/mg creatinine) in the past week, adjusting for creatinine concentration, age, sex, country, and cannabis use. All vaping and/or smoking groups had higher concentrations of TNE-2 than no use (n = 146; geometric mean [SD], 0.19 [1.14] nmol/mg creatinine; P < .001 for all contrasts). Among adolescents who exclusively vaped (n = 73), TNE-2 concentrations were not significantly different between those who reported using products containing more than 20 mg/mL nicotine (n = 33; geometric mean [SD], 4.35 [18.25] nmol/mg creatinine) and containing 20 mg/mL nicotine or less (n = 28; geometric mean [SD], 5.13 [15.64] nmol/mg creatinine). Reported use of vaping products containing nicotine salts (n = 23) was associated with higher concentration of TNE-2 (geometric mean [SD], 10.78 [18.03] nmol/mg creatinine) than reported use of products without nicotine salts (n = 29; geometric mean [SD], 2.72 [15.42] nmol/ng creatinine; P = .03) or reporting "don't know" (n = 14; geometric mean [SD], 1.55 [15.01] nmol/ng creatinine; P = .009). Similar patterns of exposure were observed for cotinine and 3OH-cotinine. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that vaping was associated with similar nicotine exposure as smoking among adolescents. Reported use of a nicotine salt product was associated with higher nicotine exposure among those who exclusively vaped, consistent with findings from laboratory and population studies indicating greater dependence for nicotine salt e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

NicotineTobacco SmokingVapingAdolescentBiomarkersCanadaCotinineCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultBiomarkersCotininehydroxycotinineNicotine

Identifiers

PMID40072439
PMCPMC11904731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.