Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072340›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2025

Of rats and robots: A mutual learning paradigm.

Oguzcan Nas, Defne Albayrak, Gunes Unal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Of rats and robots: A mutual learning paradigm.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oguzcan NasBehavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Defne AlbayrakBehavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gunes UnalBehavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-0271

Funding

Boğaziçi Üniversitesi 22B07M2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robots are increasingly used alongside Skinner boxes to train animals in operant conditioning tasks. Similarly, animals are being employed in artificial intelligence research to train various algorithms. However, both types of experiments rely on unidirectional learning, where one partner-the animal or the robot-acts as the teacher and the other as the student. Here, we present a novel animal-robot interaction paradigm that enables bidirectional, or mutual, learning between a Wistar rat and a robot. The two agents interacted with each other to achieve specific goals, dynamically adjusting their actions based on the positive (rewarding) or negative (punishing) signals provided by their partner. The paradigm was tested in silico with two artificial reinforcement learning agents and in vivo with different rat-robot pairs. In the virtual trials, both agents were able to adapt their behavior toward reward maximization, achieving mutual learning. The in vivo experiments revealed that rats rapidly acquired the behaviors necessary to receive the reward and exhibited passive avoidance learning for negative signals when the robot displayed a steep learning curve. The developed paradigm can be used in various animal-machine interactions to test the efficacy of different learning rules and reinforcement schedules.

Indexed as

LearningRoboticsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceAvoidance LearningConditioning, OperantMaleRatsRats, WistarReinforcement, PsychologyRewardanimal–robot interactionmutual learningoperant conditioningoptimizationreinforcement

Identifiers

PMID40072340
PMCPMC11954425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.