Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072288›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025

Porous Silicon Nanoneedles Efficiently Deliver Adenine Base Editor to Correct a Recurrent Pathogenic COL7A1 Variant in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Salman Ahmad Mustfa, Marija Dimitrievska, Cong Wang, Chenlei Gu, Ningjia Sun, Katarzyna Romańczuk, Pawel Karpinski, Łukasz Łaczmański, John A McGrath, Joanna Jacków-Malinowska and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Poking Pluripotency: Nanoinjection Into Human iPSCs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Salman Ahmad MustfaCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5414-4478
Marija DimitrievskaCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-8984
Cong WangCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0263-1933
Chenlei GuCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3034-5319
Ningjia SunCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Katarzyna RomańczukHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, 53-114, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0346-3812
Pawel KarpinskiDepartment of Genetics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, 50-367, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-694X
Łukasz ŁaczmańskiHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, 53-114, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-5483
John A McGrathSt John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-9964
Joanna Jacków-MalinowskaSt John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7896
Ciro ChiappiniCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-4359

Funding

Cure EBEuropean Research Council ENBION 759577King's-China Scholarship CouncilLondon Centre for NanotechnologyMedical Research Council MC_PC_18052Wellcome LeapWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base editing, a CRISPR-based genome editing technology, enables precise correction of single-nucleotide variants, promising resolutive treatment for monogenic genetic disorders like recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). However, the application of base editors in cell manufacturing is hindered by inconsistent efficiency and high costs, contributed by suboptimal delivery methods. Nanoneedles have emerged as an effective delivery approach, enabling highly efficient, non-perturbing gene therapies both in vitro and in vivo. Here we demonstrate that nanoneedle delivery of an adenine base editor corrects a heterozygous single-nucleotide pathogenic variant in COL7A1 in primary RDEB fibroblasts in vitro with 96.5% efficiency, without inducing off-target variants. The nanoneedle delivery maintains cell viability and displays modest phenotypical alterations unlike conventional cationic lipid transfection. The nanoneedle-mediated editing significantly increases the production and secretion of full-length type VII collagen protein, contributing to restore functional fibroblasts phenotype by improving cell adhesion. These findings underscore the suitability and safety of nanoneedles for gene editing in a clinically relevant context of cell manufacturing, establishing a foundation for their use in cell therapies.

Indexed as

AdenineCollagen Type VIIEpidermolysis Bullosa DystrophicaGene EditingNanostructuresSiliconCell SurvivalFibroblastsHumansPorosityAdenineCOL7A1 protein, humanCollagen Type VIISiliconadvanced therapycell therapygene editingnanoneedlesporous silicon

Identifiers

PMID40072288
PMCPMC12038538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.