Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072265›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Protothecosis in Dogs: A Narrative Review.

Tomasz Jagielski, Angelika Proskurnicka, Mateusz Iskra, Sylwia Wronka, Zofia Bakuła, Patrizia Danesi, Marconi Rodrigues de Farias, Fábio Vinícius Ramos Portilho, Márcio Garcia Ribeiro, Uwe Rösler and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Experimental protothecosis in a murine model.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The virulence potential ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. First isolation ofMedical mycology case reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tomasz JagielskiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9553-5742
Angelika ProskurnickaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz IskraDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Sylwia WronkaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Zofia BakułaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Patrizia DanesiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Marconi Rodrigues de FariasPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Fábio Vinícius Ramos PortilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Márcio Garcia RibeiroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Uwe RöslerInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rui KanoDepartment of Veterinary Dermatology, Nihon University School of Veterinary Medicine, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan.
Richard MalikCentre for Veterinary Education, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protothecosis is a rare and unusual disease that affects both humans and animals, including dogs. The causative agents are unicellular, achlorophyllous, "yeast-like" microalgae of the genus Prototheca (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). Although usually saprophytic, Prototheca may, under conditions of immunologic compromise, become pathogenic and even lethal to the host. We present a synthesis of the current literature on protothecosis, with special emphasis on disease features in the dog. Five open-access scientific journal repositories were searched two times by two independent reviewers for original studies (including case reports, standard articles, and conference abstracts) pertaining to cases of protothecosis in dogs. Findings about protothecosis cases in dogs (e.g., animal metrics, type of infection, implemented treatment, and treatment outcome) were synthesized in independent data tables. Eighty studies describing 125 cases of protothecosis in dogs qualified for final analysis. Based on this investigation, protothecosis in dogs can be defined as an emerging disease that poses a serious challenge to the veterinary profession in terms of both diagnosis and management. In general, clinical signs and physical findings most often are referable to the gastrointestinal tract (n = 68; 54.4%). Yet the most common clinical manifestation in dogs is disseminated systemic infection (n = 84; 67.2%), including clinical signs referable to inflammation affecting more than one organ. We emphasize the complexity of Prototheca infection in dogs by summarizing clinical and laboratory findings from 125 cases of Prototheca infection in dogs published over the last half-century.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesInfectionsProtothecaAnimalsDogsalgaecolitiscytbdogPrototheca spp.systemic infection

Identifiers

PMID40072265
PMCPMC11898871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.