ReviewJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Protothecosis in Dogs: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful treatment of the first reported case of Prototheca wickerhamii infection in a dog living in Tasmania, Australia.Australian veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Prolonged survival of 3 dogs with Prototheca bovis infection treated with posaconazole.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Experimental protothecosis in a murine model.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Recovery and Survival of Prototheca Microalgae During Wastewater Treatment Process.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- The virulence potential ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- First isolation ofMedical mycology case reports · 2025Article
- Allelopathic compound 2-methoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone is broadly effective against pathogenicAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Granulomatous colitis associated withJFMS open reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protothecosis is a rare and unusual disease that affects both humans and animals, including dogs. The causative agents are unicellular, achlorophyllous, "yeast-like" microalgae of the genus Prototheca (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). Although usually saprophytic, Prototheca may, under conditions of immunologic compromise, become pathogenic and even lethal to the host. We present a synthesis of the current literature on protothecosis, with special emphasis on disease features in the dog. Five open-access scientific journal repositories were searched two times by two independent reviewers for original studies (including case reports, standard articles, and conference abstracts) pertaining to cases of protothecosis in dogs. Findings about protothecosis cases in dogs (e.g., animal metrics, type of infection, implemented treatment, and treatment outcome) were synthesized in independent data tables. Eighty studies describing 125 cases of protothecosis in dogs qualified for final analysis. Based on this investigation, protothecosis in dogs can be defined as an emerging disease that poses a serious challenge to the veterinary profession in terms of both diagnosis and management. In general, clinical signs and physical findings most often are referable to the gastrointestinal tract (n = 68; 54.4%). Yet the most common clinical manifestation in dogs is disseminated systemic infection (n = 84; 67.2%), including clinical signs referable to inflammation affecting more than one organ. We emphasize the complexity of Prototheca infection in dogs by summarizing clinical and laboratory findings from 125 cases of Prototheca infection in dogs published over the last half-century.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.