Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40072240›Full record

ArticleZoo biology

Effect of Carcass Feeds on Feeding Behavior and Social Interactions in Zoo-Based African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus).

Neil R Jordan, Emily Therese Boyd, Jennifer Conaghan, Jordan Michelmore, Michelle E Shaw, Benjamin J Pitcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neil R JordanCentre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0712-8301
Emily Therese BoydSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer ConaghanTaronga Institute of Science and Learning, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Dubbo and Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jordan MichelmoreTaronga Institute of Science and Learning, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Dubbo and Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle E ShawTaronga Institute of Science and Learning, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Dubbo and Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-0713
Benjamin J PitcherTaronga Institute of Science and Learning, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Dubbo and Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8580-0343

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in zoos involves several challenges, including the difficulty of providing appropriate stimulation and enrichment for naturally wide-ranging, energetic, cursorial hunters. Perhaps consequently, zoo packs can exhibit bouts of extreme intra-pack aggression rarely seen in the wild. As with other species, considerable efforts are required to balance the retention and exhibition of wild-type behaviors, against ensuring that the nutritional and welfare needs of individual group-living animals are met. While some behaviors, such as hunting and wide-ranging movements are impossible to mimic in zoos, the provision of food may be refined to allow natural feeding behavior to be displayed. We conducted a feeding experiment on a breeding pack of nine African wild dogs at Taronga Western Plains Zoo in Australia, presenting food in three treatments (individual pieces, butchered carcasses, and whole carcasses) to determine whether: (1) natural age-related patterns of feeding behavior were observed; (2) food type or presentation affected feeding behavior, duration, and interactions. Free-ranging African wild dogs exhibit an age-based feeding structure at kill sites that is rare in other species. We found that carcass and butchered carcass feeds more closely exhibited the age-based feeding observed in the wild. The pack spent twenty times as long consuming carcasses than food presented as individual pieces, with consumption times matching those in the wild. Carcass and butchered carcass feeds also increased the number and rate of interactions over food compared to individual pieces, with a high proportion of interactions resulting in sharing outcomes. This suggests that carcass feeds allow the exhibition of natural patterns of behavior without increasing the risk of negative social interactions. Our results highlight the importance and possibility of managing socially complex carnivores through husbandry that balances the display of natural behavior with positive animal welfare.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimals, ZooCanidaeFeeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimals, WildFemaleMalecarnivoredominancefeedinghusbandryLycaon pictussocialzoo‐based animal management

Identifiers

PMID40072240
PMCPMC12335230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.