ReviewCells2025
The Histomorphology to Molecular Transition: Exploring the Genomic Landscape of Poorly Differentiated Epithelial Endometrial Cancers.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity in Cancer: Transcriptional Regulation, Biomarker Challenges, and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Review
- Immunosuppressive cells as barriers to cancer therapy: mechanisms and emerging solutions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Serous Papillary Adenofibroma Cyst of the Ovary in a Young Woman: Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Histopathological Subtypes of Cutaneous Melanoma: Prognostic and Molecular Implications.Cureus · 2025Review
- Molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer via a simplified one-step NGS classifier, ARID1A and ZFHX4 mutations help further subclassify CNL/MSI-H patients.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- From Abnormal Uterine Bleeding to Malignancy: The Role of Hormonal Profiling and Histopathology in Early Detection of Endometrial Carcinoma.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The peremptory need to circumvent challenges associated with poorly differentiated epithelial endometrial cancers (PDEECs), also known as Type II endometrial cancers (ECs), has prompted therapeutic interrogation of the prototypically intractable and most prevalent gynecological malignancy. PDEECs account for most endometrial cancer-related mortalities due to their aggressive nature, late-stage detection, and poor response to standard therapies. PDEECs are characterized by heterogeneous histopathological features and distinct molecular profiles, and they pose significant clinical challenges due to their propensity for rapid progression. Regardless of the complexities around PDEECs, they are still being administered inefficiently in the same manner as clinically indolent and readily curable type-I ECs. Currently, there are no targeted therapies for the treatment of PDEECs. The realization of the need for new treatment options has transformed our understanding of PDEECs by enabling more precise classification based on genomic profiling. The transition from a histopathological to a molecular classification has provided critical insights into the underlying genetic and epigenetic alterations in these malignancies. This review explores the genomic landscape of PDEECs, with a focus on identifying key molecular subtypes and associated genetic mutations that are prevalent in aggressive variants. Here, we discuss how molecular classification correlates with clinical outcomes and can refine diagnostic accuracy, predict patient prognosis, and inform therapeutic strategies. Deciphering the molecular underpinnings of PDEECs has led to advances in precision oncology and protracted therapeutic remissions for patients with these untamable malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.