ReviewEFORT open reviews2025
Esophageal perforation more than 10 years after anterior cervical spine surgery: a case report and literature review.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complete Migration of Metallic Plate in a Pseudodiverticulum of Cervical Esophagus.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal perforation is a rare but serious complication that can occur post-cervical spine surgery. This case report presents the clinical course, diagnostic challenges and management strategies of a patient who had a late-diagnosis esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). A woman in her 50s underwent ACSS for cervical spondylosis. Three months postoperatively, she experienced persistent right neck and shoulder pain. Despite multiple consultations, an esophageal perforation was only diagnosed 10 years later when a neck mass ruptured, discharging food debris. Surgical management included removing the anterior cervical plate and reconstruction with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. Postoperatively, she faced wound complications, and the perforation failed to heal despite multiple debridement and stent placements. Ultimately, complete excision of the diverticulum, repair of the perforation and muscle flap reconstruction led to her recovery, with no recurrence over an 8-year follow-up. We reviewed the literature on cases with esophageal perforation occurring more than 10 years after anterior cervical surgery and summarized the treatment experiences. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges and delayed presentation of esophageal perforation post-ACSS. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management are essential. In cases of late perforation, hardware removal, diverticulum excision and a muscle flap are critical to achieving successful closure of the esophageal lesion, preventing recurrence and ensuring comprehensive repair. Addressing esophageal diverticula during perforation treatment is crucial to prevent recurrence and ensure thorough repair. This highlights the need for high clinical suspicion and a coordinated surgical approach to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.