Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071749›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

The Cerebrospinal Fluid Secretion Rate Increases in Awake and Freely Moving Rats but Differs With Experimental Methodology.

Trine L Toft-Bertelsen, Beatriche L Edelbo, Annette B Steffensen, Sara D Lolansen, Jonathan H Wardman, Dennis B Jensen, Nanna MacAulay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Trine L Toft-BertelsenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-0094
Beatriche L EdelboDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.
Annette B SteffensenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.
Sara D LolansenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.
Jonathan H WardmanDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.
Dennis B JensenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.
Nanna MacAulayDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-6600

Funding

Lundbeck Foundation R303-2018-3005Lundbeck Foundation R313-2019-735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics hold implications for neurological health. Despite its importance, accurate quantification of the CSF secretion rate remains a challenge due to methodological controversies and the influence of anesthesia. A novel technique is established to determine CSF dynamics in awake and freely moving rats, and the CSF secretion is quantified with three different methodologies. The CSF secretion rate is higher in awake rats than in anesthetized rats, the latter demonstrating no requirement for mechanical ventilation for optimal CSF quantification. The CSF secretion rate is ≈10-fold lower with the "direct method" than with the ventriculo-cisternal perfusion assay, although the relative acetazolamide-mediated reduction in CSF secretion is similar across three tested methods. The findings demonstrate the importance of awake models for optimal quantification of the absolute rate of CSF secretion but highlight the versatility of methodologies for the determination of relative changes in CSF secretion associated with inhibitors, age, sex, and various pathologies.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidWakefulnessAnimalsFemaleMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyacetazolamideCSFCSF measurementsdirect methodventriculo‐cisternal perfusion assay

Identifiers

PMID40071749
PMCPMC12061303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.