Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071719›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025

Advancing Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Scoping Review of Breakthroughs in Implantoplasty and Er:YAG Laser Therapies.

Sean Mojaver, Joseph Fiorellini, Hector Sarmiento

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean MojaverDepartment of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1119-218X
Joseph FiorelliniDepartment of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hector SarmientoDepartment of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeri-implantitis represents a significant challenge in dental implantology, characterized by inflammatory reactions around osseointegrated dental implants that lead to progressive alveolar bone loss.

objectivesTo generate a scoping review that evaluates the efficacy of implantoplasty and Er:YAG laser therapies in managing peri-implantitis by synthesizing recent evidence on their impact on key clinical parameters-including probing depth reduction, bleeding on probing improvement, and marginal bone level stabilization-and to explore the potential synergistic benefits of combining these modalities for enhanced treatment outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published from January 2018 to the present. The search strategy combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms with Boolean operators (e.g., "peri-implantitis" AND "implantoplasty" OR "Er:YAG laser"). Eligible studies met the following PICOS criteria: Population-adults diagnosed with peri-implantitis; Intervention- implantoplasty procedures aimed at reducing biofilm retention via mechanical alteration of the implant surface; Comparison-Er:YAG laser treatment for implant decontamination; Outcomes-primary outcomes included changes in probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and marginal bone levels (MBL), while secondary outcomes comprised improvements in soft tissue health and patient-reported outcomes; Study design-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and at least 10 patients (or 10 implants) per group.

resultsOut of 649 identified articles, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. In implantoplasty studies, follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months with groups of 10-20 implants; in Er:YAG laser studies, follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months with 12-24 patients per group. Both modalities produced significant improvements in PD reduction, BOP reduction, and MBL stabilization. Comparative analysis suggests that while each treatment offers distinct advantages, combining them may further optimize outcomes.

conclusionImplantoplasty and Er:YAG laser treatments are promising modalities for managing peri-implantitis. Implantoplasty reduces surface roughness and bacterial retention, whereas Er:YAG laser therapy provides precise decontamination with minimal thermal damage.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsLasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyPeri-ImplantitisAlveolar Bone LossHumansTreatment OutcomeDental Implantsdental implantsEr:YAG laserimplantoplastyperi‐implantitisscoping reviewtreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40071719
PMCPMC11898008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.