ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2025
Genome-Wide Scan of Fifth Finger Clinodactyly.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFifth finger clinodactyly describes the conspicuous curvature of the fifth digit toward the other digits of the hand. Phenotypic expression can range from mild and almost imperceptible to severe, where function is impacted, and clinical intervention may be required. Although classically considered an autosomal dominant trait based on early family studies, no genes have been mapped for the trait. Further, there is epidemiological evidence that mild (typical-range) fifth finger clinodactyly may have a different etiology than more severe forms.
methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, we carried out genome-wide association mapping of common genetic variants for clinodactyly in three cohorts separately and combined results via meta-analysis, treating the trait as either a continuous quantitative variable (n
resultsThe vast majority of participants in these cohorts exhibited mild forms of clinodactyly. Both the individual cohort results and meta-analyses revealed no genome-wide significant loci. We identified several possible suggestive signals (p < 1 × 10
conclusionWhile our results cannot definitively exclude the contribution of common variants to fifth finger clinodactyly due to the small sample size, they do suggest that the mild form of the trait is unlikely to be related to a major gene effect operating in a simple Mendelian manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.