Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071498›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2025

Impact of Donor Age and Donor Cytomegalovirus Serostatus on Outcomes After Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Rohtesh S Mehta, Hannah Choe, Jennifer Saultz, Zimu Gong, Prashant Sharma, Taha Al-Juhaishi, Gabriela S Petitto, Aleksandr Lazaryan, Anurag Singh, Elisabetta Xue and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Rohtesh S MehtaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8532-544X
Hannah ChoeDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jennifer SaultzDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-9466
Zimu GongOU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Prashant SharmaBlood and Marrow Transplant/Acute Leukemia Program, Intermountain Medical Group, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Taha Al-JuhaishiOU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8359-0178
Gabriela S PetittoDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Aleksandr LazaryanDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Anurag SinghDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Elisabetta XueCenter for Immuno-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1963-9555
Dimana DimitrovaCenter for Immuno-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mustafa HyderCenter for Immuno-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Shannon McCurdyDivision of Hematology-Oncology/Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2813-6781
Annie ImDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-7100
Bryan HuberBlood and Marrow Transplant/Acute Leukemia Program, Intermountain Medical Group, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Yosra M AljawaiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jennifer KanakryCenter for Immuno-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Filippo MilanoFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-2159
Christopher G KanakryCenter for Immuno-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. While letermovir prophylaxis is available for CMV-seropositive recipients, optimal donor selection for CMV-seronegative recipients remains unclear, with donor age often prioritized over CMV serostatus. We investigated the relative impact of donor age and CMV serostatus in CMV-seronegative recipients (n = 1013) with either CMV-seropositive (n = 318) or CMV-seronegative donors (n = 695), who underwent HCT with HLA-matched sibling donors with calcineurin inhibitor-based or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, or haploidentical donors with PTCy. Multiple conventional and machine-learning approaches were employed to account for confounding factors. Across all analyses, CMV-seropositive donor status was consistently associated with significantly inferior overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival, primarily driven by increased non-relapse mortality (NRM). Older donor age showed a statistically significant association with OS and DFS in some but not all models, and its effect size was small (about 1% increased hazard per year in Cox proportional hazard model) compared to the substantial impact of CMV-seropositive donors (about 27%-33% increased hazards for worse OS, approximately 50%-60% higher NRM in Cox proportional hazard model). However, our machine learning model revealed a more nuanced and complex non-linear effect of donor age, further demonstrating the adverse impact of donor CMV serostatus. Our findings suggest that prioritizing a CMV-seronegative donor may be associated with improved outcomes in CMV-seronegative recipients. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDonor SelectionHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCyclophosphamideFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedTransplantation, HomologousCyclophosphamidecalcineurin inhibitorCMVCNIcytomegalovirusdonor ageHaploidenticalHLA matched sibling donorpost‐transplantation cyclophosphamidePTCy

Identifiers

PMID40071498
PMCPMC13050464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.