ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2025
Impact of Donor Age and Donor Cytomegalovirus Serostatus on Outcomes After Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Pitfalls of Categorizing Donor Age: Arbitrary Cutoffs Fail to Predict Survival in Haploidentical HCT.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- A novel prognostic scoring system HATS for acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Donor selection in PTCy haploidentical transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Real-world efficacy and safety of letermovir versus ganciclovir prophylaxis in adolescent patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single center observational study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. While letermovir prophylaxis is available for CMV-seropositive recipients, optimal donor selection for CMV-seronegative recipients remains unclear, with donor age often prioritized over CMV serostatus. We investigated the relative impact of donor age and CMV serostatus in CMV-seronegative recipients (n = 1013) with either CMV-seropositive (n = 318) or CMV-seronegative donors (n = 695), who underwent HCT with HLA-matched sibling donors with calcineurin inhibitor-based or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, or haploidentical donors with PTCy. Multiple conventional and machine-learning approaches were employed to account for confounding factors. Across all analyses, CMV-seropositive donor status was consistently associated with significantly inferior overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival, primarily driven by increased non-relapse mortality (NRM). Older donor age showed a statistically significant association with OS and DFS in some but not all models, and its effect size was small (about 1% increased hazard per year in Cox proportional hazard model) compared to the substantial impact of CMV-seropositive donors (about 27%-33% increased hazards for worse OS, approximately 50%-60% higher NRM in Cox proportional hazard model). However, our machine learning model revealed a more nuanced and complex non-linear effect of donor age, further demonstrating the adverse impact of donor CMV serostatus. Our findings suggest that prioritizing a CMV-seronegative donor may be associated with improved outcomes in CMV-seronegative recipients. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.