ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Emotion Induction Modulates Neural Dynamics Related to the Originality of Ideational Creativity.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotions remarkably impact our creative minds; nevertheless, a comprehensive mapping of their underlying neural mechanisms remains elusive. Therefore, we examined the influence of emotion induction on ideational originality and its associated neural dynamics. Participants were randomly presented with three short videos with sad, neutral, and happy content. After each video, ideational originality was evaluated using the alternate uses task. Both happy and sad inductions significantly enhanced ideational originality relative to the neutral induction condition. However, no significant difference was observed in ideational originality between the happy and sad emotion inductions. Associated neural dynamics were assessed through EEG time-frequency (TF) power and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) analyses. Our findings suggest that emotional states elicit distinct TF and PAC profiles associated with ideational originality. Relative to baseline, gamma activity was enhanced after the neutral induction and more enhanced after the induction of a happy emotion but reduced after the induction of sad emotion 2-4 s after starting the task. Our functional connectivity couplings suggest that inducing happy and sad emotions may influence the working memory and attentional system differently, leading to varying effects on associated processing modes. Inducing a happy emotion may result in decreased neural activity and processing of rich information in working memory for exploring more original ideas through cognitive flexibility. In contrast, inducing a sad emotion may enhance neural activity and increase coupling within the attention system to exploit and select fewer original ideas through cognitive persistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.