Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071361›Full record

SynthesisActas espanolas de psiquiatria2025

Psychosocial Interventions in the Rehabilitation and the Management of Psychosis and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review on Digitally-Delivered Interventions.

Laura Orsolini, Giulio Longo, Umberto Volpe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura OrsoliniUnit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Giulio LongoUnit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Umberto VolpeUnit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia and psychotic disorders are disabling, complex and severe psychiatric conditions, which may pose a significant therapeutic challenge. Integrating current psychopharmacological treatment with psychosocial interventions demonstrated a higher efficacy in terms of prognosis. However, most schizophrenia or psychotic patients may have restricted or no access to evidence-based psychosocial interventions, mainly due to poor dissemination of specialized interventions or stigma. Therefore, we aim to systematically review all studies about the current evidence on the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, effectiveness, and benefits of digitally-delivered psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions for individuals suffering from schizophrenia or psychotic disorders.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted of the literature from 2000 to 2024 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, by using PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and OVID databases and combining the search approach using both free text terms and Medical Subject Headings (MESH) headings for the topics "psychoeducation", "psychosocial intervention" and "psychosis" and "schizophrenia".

resultsOut of a total of 3042 reviewed papers, 69 studies were included here. The interventions included web-based family and individual psychoeducation, integrated web-based therapy, social networking, peer and expert moderation, virtual reality-assisted and mobile-based psychosocial interventions. Results showed that digitally-delivered interventions have a positive effect in ensuring the continuity and maintenance of the effectiveness of psychosocial treatments, by providing personalized, flexible, and evidence-based interventions to patients with psychosis and/or schizophrenia. At the same time, the studies included demonstrated the acceptability and feasibility of this kind of intervention in clinical practice.

conclusionsDigital interventions have the potential to deliver non-stigmatizing, constantly available psychosocial and psychoeducational interventions in psychosis and schizophrenia by increasing access to mental health care and not costly interventions. However, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies should compare and evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of web-based vs. face-to-face psychosocial interventions amongst schizophrenia and psychosis individuals.

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaHumansPatient Education as TopicTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40071361
PMCPMC11898269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.