ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial in pediatric asthma to assess the long- and short-term effects of eHealth interventions: protocol of the CIRCUS study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guided Inhalation via Electronic Monitoring in Children With Uncontrolled Asthma (the IMAGINE Study): Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
- Telemedicine in the management of chronic respiratory diseases: lessons learned and future perspectives.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma is one of childhood's most prevalent chronic conditions significantly impacting the quality of life. Current asthma management lacks real-time, objective, and longitudinal monitoring reflected by a high prevalence of uncontrolled asthma. Long-term home monitoring promises to establish new clinical endpoints for timely anticipation. In addition, integrating eHealth interventions holds promise for timely and appropriate medical anticipation for controlling symptoms and preventing asthma exacerbations.
objectivesThis study aims to provide a pragmatic study design for gaining insight into longitudinal monitoring, assessing, and comparing eHealth interventions' short- and long-term effects on improving pediatric asthma care.
designThe CIRCUS study design is a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) with a dynamic cohort of 300 pediatric asthma patients.
methodsThe study gathers observational and patient-reported measurements at set moments including patient characteristics, healthcare utilization, and asthma, clinical, and environmental outcomes. Participants are randomly appointed to the intervention or control group. The effects of the eHealth interventions are assessed and compared to the control group, deploying the CIRCUS outcomes. The participants continue in the CIRCUS cohort after completing the intervention and its follow-up.
resultsThis study was ethically approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (NL85668.100.23) on February 15th, 2024. DISCUSSION: The CIRCUS study can provide a rich and unique dataset that can improve insight into risk factors of asthma exacerbations and yield new clinical endpoints. Furthermore, the effects of eHealth interventions can be assessed and compared with each other both short- and long-term. In addition, patient groups within the patient population can be discerned to tailor eHealth interventions to personalized needs on improving asthma management.
conclusionIn conclusion, CIRCUS can provide valuable clinical data to discern risk factors for asthma exacerbations, identify and compare effective scalable eHealth solutions, and improve pediatric asthma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.