ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2025
New antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli.
Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The efficacy and safety of colistimethate sodium in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: a real-world observational study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
- Avibactam-based combinations for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections.Le infezioni in medicina · 2026Review
- "Dusting Off the Cobwebs": Rethinking How We Use New Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Revisiting the Metallo-International journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in infections caused by Difficult-to-Treat Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-world data in Greece.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global threat. It increases mortality and morbidity rates and places a heavy burden on healthcare systems. Healthcare professionals can address the increasing issue of AMR by advocating responsible antibiotic use and supporting the development of new medications. Despite the economic, logistic, and scientific challenges, it is reassuring that new agents continue to be developed. This review addresses new antibiotics in the pipeline. A review of the literature was conducted including Medline, and Clinicaltrials.org, for approved and in pipeline antibiotics in phase 3 or new drug applications (NDA). We found several new antibiotics and reviewed their current development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, and indications for which they have been approved. The included studies from phase 3 clinical trials were mainly utilized for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and pneumonia acquired in healthcare settings. The availability of these agents is limited for high-priority organisms. The identified antibiotics were primarily based on previously known molecules or pre-existing antimicrobial agents. There is a limited number of antibiotics against high priority organisms. New antimicrobial agents targeting the top-priority organisms identified by the World Health Organization are urgently needed. However, some antibiotics target ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.