Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071239›Full record

ArticleWearable technologies2025

Design and evaluation of AE4W: An active and flexible shaft-driven shoulder exoskeleton for workers.

Marco Rossini, Sander De Bock, Vincent Ducastel, Gabriël Van De Velde, Kevin De Pauw, Tom Verstraten, Dirk Lefeber, Joost Geeroms, Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wearable technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco RossiniBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-5294
Sander De BockBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-9702
Vincent DucastelBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Gabriël Van De VeldeBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Kevin De PauwBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Tom VerstratenBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-5398
Dirk LefeberBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Joost GeeromsBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Carlos Rodriguez-GuerreroBrussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wide adoption of occupational shoulder exoskeletons in industrial settings remains limited. Passive exoskeletons were proved effective in a limited amount of application scenarios, such as (quasi-)static overhead handling tasks. Quasi-active devices, albeit representing an improved version of their passive predecessors, do not allow full modulation of the amount of assistance delivered to the user, lacking versatility and adaptability in assisting various dynamic tasks. Active occupational shoulder exoskeletons could overcome these limitations by controlling the shape of the delivered torque profile according to the task they aim to assist. However, most existing active devices lack compactness and wearability. This prevents their implementation in working environments. In this work, we present a new active shoulder exoskeleton, named Active Exo4Work (AE4W). It features a new flexible shaft-driven remote actuation unit that allows the positioning of the motors close to the wearer's center of mass while it maintains a kinematic structure that is compatible with the biological motion of the shoulder joint. in vitro and in vivo experiments have been conducted to investigate the performance of AE4W. Experimental results show that the exoskeleton is kinematically compatible with the user's workspace since it does not constrain the natural range of motion of the shoulder joint. Moreover, this device can effectively provide different types of assistance while the user executes various dynamic tasks, without altering perceived comfort.

Indexed as

active shoulder exoskeletonflexible shaft-driven remote-actuationoccupational exoskeleton

Identifiers

PMID40071239
PMCPMC11896670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.