Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071216›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

"Optimizing sEMG Gesture Recognition with Stacked Autoencoder Neural Network for Bionic Hand".

Mr Amol Pandurang Yadav, Dr Sandip R Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mr Amol Pandurang YadavAll India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society's Institute Of Information Technology, India.
Dr Sandip R PatilBharati Vidyapeeth's College Of Engineering for Women, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a novel deep learning approach for surface electromyography (sEMG) gesture recognition using stacked autoencoder neural network (SAE)s. The method leverages hierarchical representation learning to extract meaningful features from raw sEMG signals, enhancing the precision and robustness of gesture classification.•Feature Extraction and Classification MODWT Decomposition: The sEMG signals were decomposed using the MODWT DECOMPOSITION(Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform) to capture various frequency components.•Time Domain Parameters: A total of 28 features per subject were extracted from the time domain, including statistical and spectral features.•Classifier Evaluation: Initial evaluations involved Autoencoder and LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis) classifiers, with Autoencoder achieving an average accuracy of 77.96 % ± 1.24, outperforming LDA's 65.36 % ± 1.09.Advanced Neural Network Approach: Stacked Autoencoder Neural Network: To address challenges in distinguishing similar gestures within grasp groups, a Stacked Autoencoder Neural Network was employed. This advanced neural network architecture improved classification accuracy to over 100 %, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling complex gesture recognition tasks. These findings emphasize the significant potential of deep learning models in enhancing prosthetic control and rehabilitation technologies. . To verify these findings, we developed a 3d hand module in ADAMS software that is simulated using Matlab-ADAMS cosimulation.

Indexed as

Deep learning, stacked neural networksFeature ExtractionGesture recognition, prosthetic controlHierarchical representationMachine learningMATLABNinapro DatabasePerformance EvaluationReal-world Applications, ADAMSRehabilitation technologyRobustnessSignal ProcessingStacked autoencoder neural network (SAE)Surface electromyography (sEMG)Temporal Dependencies

Identifiers

PMID40071216
PMCPMC11894319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.