ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Non-destructive identification of commercial jerky types based on multi-band hyperspectral imaging with machine learning.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for identifying antibacterial agents derived from yam (Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Machine learning model interpretability using SHAP values: Applied to the task of classifying and predicting the nutritional content of different cuts of mutton.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Near-infrared prediction of total phosphorus in leaves content in korla fragrant pear with growth period specificity via spectral modeling.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commercial jerky counterfeiting is widespread in the market. This study combined visible-near-infrared and short-wave-near-infrared hyperspectral imaging along with multiple machine learning algorithms for non-destructive identification of five types of commercial jerky products, and explored the impact of different spectral bands, algorithm selection, and optimization methods on identification performance. After data preprocessing, all models' accuracies and stability improved. Specifically, the logistic regression model was best for jerky identification, with 85.78 %-100.00 % accuracy. With hyperparameter optimization, Support Vector Machine with linear kernel had highest accuracy (89.29 % and 95.29 % in two bands). Additionally, the artificial neural network with the hyperbolic tangent activation function had optimal training performance, exceeding 90.00 % accuracy. The findings demonstrate short-wave-near-infrared hyperspectral imaging combined with linear models (logistic regression and Support Vector Machine with linear kernel parameter settings) is better for identifying the types of jerky. This study provides reference for the band, model selection, and optimization of jerky type identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.