ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Following Endovascular Treatment.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-Center Registry Cohort Study on Prognostic Factors and Prediction Model Construction in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Construction of an Integrated Intelligent Model for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Based on Deep Learning
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting the risk of postoperative avascular necrosis in patients with talar fractures based on an interpretable machine learning model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been recommended as a superior modality for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm. However, there still exists a worse percentage of poor functional outcome in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) undergoing EVT. Therefore, it is urgently needed to investigate the risk factors and develop a critical decision model in the subtype of such patients. Methods: We extracted the target variables from an ongoing registry cohort study, PROSAH-MPC, which was conducted in multiple centers in China. We randomly assigned these patients to training and validation cohorts with a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to find the potential factors, and then nine machine learning models and a stack ensemble model were developed with optimized variables. The performance of these models was evaluated through several indicators, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). We further use Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) methods for the distribution of feature visualization based on the optimal models. Results: A total of 226 eligible patients with poor-grade aSAH undergoing EVT were enrolled, while 89 (39.4%) has a poor 12-month outcome. Age (Adjusted OR [aOR], 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.13; p = 0.002), subarachnoid hemorrhage volume (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05; p = 0.033), World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade (WFNS) (aOR, 2.03; 95% CI: 1.05-3.93; p = 0.035), and Hunt-Hess grade (aOR, 2.36; 95% CI: 1.13-4.93; p = 0.022) were identified as the independent risk factors of the poor outcome. Then, the prediction models developed have revealed that LightGBM algorithm has a superior performance with an AUC-ROC value of 0.842 in the validation cohort, while the SHAP results showed that age is the most important risk factor affecting functional outcomes. Conclusion: The LightGBM model holds immense potential in facilitating risk stratification for poor-grade aSAH patients undergoing endovascular treatment who are at risk of adverse outcomes, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making processes. Trial Registration: PROSAH-MPC. NCT05738083. Registered 16 November 2022 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05738083.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.