Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071096›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Deep learning model for the early prediction of pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Meng Lv, BinXin Zhao, Yan Mao, Yongmei Wang, Xiaohui Su, Zaixian Zhang, Jie Wu, Xueqiang Gao, Qi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Artificial intelligence in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: current advances and challenges].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meng LvBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
BinXin ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yan MaoBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yongmei WangBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xiaohui SuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Zaixian ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jie WuDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xueqiang GaoBreast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of various deep learning methods on DCE-MRI, in order to provide a simple and accessible tool for predicting pathologic response of NAC in breast cancer patients. Methods: In this study, we enrolled 313 breast cancer patients who had complete DCE-MRI data and underwent NAC followed by breast surgery. According to Miller-Payne criteria, the efficacy of NAC was categorized into two groups: the patients achieved grade 1-3 of Miller-Payne criteria were classified as the non-responders, while patients achieved grade 4-5 of Miller-Payne criteria were classified as responders. Multiple deep learning frameworks, including ViT, VGG16, ShuffleNet_v2, ResNet18, MobileNet_v2, MnasNet-0.5, GoogleNet, DenseNet121, and AlexNet, were used for transfer learning of the classification model. The deep learning features were obtained from the final fully connected layer of the deep learning models, with 256 features extracted based on DCE-MRI data for each patient of each deep learning model. Various machine-learning techniques, including support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), RandomForest, ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multiple-layer perceptron (MLP), were employed to construct classification models. Results: We utilized various deep learning models to extract features and subsequently constructed machine learning models. Based on the performance of different machine learning models' AUC values, we selected the classifiers with the best performance. ResNet18 exhibited superior performance, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82 - 0.91) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.96) in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Using pre-treatment DCE-MRI images, our study trained multiple deep models and developed the best-performing DLR model for predicting pathologic response of NAC in breast cancer patients. This prognostic tool provides a dependable and impartial basis for effectively identifying breast cancer patients who are most likely to benefit from NAC before its initiation. At the same time, it can also identify those patients who are insensitive to NAC, allowing them to proceed directly to surgical treatment and prevent the risk of losing the opportunity for surgery due to disease progression after NAC.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learning modeldynamic contrast enhancement MRIMiller-Payne grading criterianeoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40071096
PMCPMC11893424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.