SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Evolving paradigms in prostate cancer screening: a decade of bibliometric insights and technological advancements.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends and hotspots in robotic-assisted prostate biopsy: a bibliometric analysis from 2008 to 2026.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prostate cancer is a major threat to global male health. This study uses bibliometric methods to analyze the dynamics and trends in prostate cancer screening research, with the aim of optimizing screening strategies and informing policy decisions. Methods: Utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection database, this study retrieved prostate cancer screening-related literature published between 2014 and 2024, totaling 5,409 articles. Data processing and analysis were conducted using CiteSpace and the Bibliometrix R package, including citation network analysis, co-word analysis, cluster analysis, and trend analysis. Results: The analysis revealed the following key findings: (1) Global literature on prostate cancer screening has grown annually, with the United States, Europe, and China leading research activity; (2) Research hotspots include the risks and benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, MRI-based screening technologies, and the use of molecular and genetic biomarkers; (3) Emerging technologies, such as machine learning and nanodiagnostic techniques, are enhancing diagnostic precision and reducing overdiagnosis; (4) Network analysis of collaborations reveals a shift toward transnational and interdisciplinary research, particularly in integrating biomedical and computer science to drive rapid advancements in screening technologies. Conclusion: This study confirms the ongoing vibrancy and technological advancement in the global field of prostate cancer screening research, emphasizing the trend towards precision medicine. Future development of prostate cancer screening strategies should focus on risk-adapted screening and the application of novel biomarkers to optimize screening outcomes and reduce unnecessary medical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.