ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2025
Segmentation of 3D OCT Images of Human Skin Using Neural Networks with U-Net Architecture.
Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based OCT Segmentation for Stiffness Quantification in Evaluating Low-Level Laser Therapy for Wound Healing.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Trial
- A U-Net model for epidermal segmentation in optical coherence tomography images of actinic keratosis.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials and Methods: Two U-Net-based network architectures for segmentation of 3D OCT skin images are proposed in this work, in which 2D and 3D blocks of 3D images serve as input data. Training was performed on thick skin OCT images acquired from 7 healthy volunteers. For training, the OCT images were semi-automatically segmented by experts in OCT and dermatology. The Sørensen-Dice coefficient, which was calculated from the segmentation results of images that did not participate in the training of the networks, was used to assess the quality of segmentation. Additional testing of the networks' capabilities in determining skin layer thicknesses was performed on an independent dataset from 8 healthy volunteers. Results: In evaluating the segmentation quality, the values of the Sørensen-Dice coefficient for the upper stratum corneum, ordered stratum corneum, epidermal cellular layer, and dermis were 0.90, 0.94, 0.89, and 0.99, respectively, for training on two-dimensional data and 0.89, 0.94, 0.87, and 0.98 for training on three-dimensional data. The values obtained for the dermis are in good agreement with the results of other works using networks based on the U-Net architecture. The thicknesses of the ordered stratum corneum and epidermal cellular layer were 153±24 and 137±17 μm, respectively, when the network was trained on two-dimensional data and 163±19 and 137±20 μm when trained on three-dimensional data. Conclusion: Neural networks based on U-Net architecture allow segmentation of skin layers on OCT images with high accuracy, which makes these networks promising for obtaining valuable diagnostic information in dermatology and cosmetology, e.g., for estimating the thickness of skin layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.