Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40071015›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025

Impact of Cochlear Implant on the Quality of Life in Post Lingual Deafened Adult Population in Tertiary Care Centre.

Mohd Aqib, Mohit Sinha, Ravi Sankar Manogaran, Nazrin Hameed, Nidhin Das K, Kalyan Chidambaram, Amit Keshri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Complications of Cochlear Implant Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohd AqibDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Mohit SinhaDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Ravi Sankar ManogaranDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Nazrin HameedDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Nidhin Das KDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Kalyan ChidambaramDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Amit KeshriDepartment of Neuro-Otology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-5055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, 7-8% of the population is affected by post lingual deafness, which can lead to job dissatisfaction, depression, social withdrawal, and educational challenges. Despite the benefits, cochlear implantation in Northern India remains underutilized. This study examines the impact of cochlear implants on post lingual deafness, along with their etiology and indications. The study reviewed audiometric, clinical, and perioperative data of 50 adult patients (> 18 years) with bilateral post lingual severe to profound hearing loss, unresponsive to hearing aids, who underwent cochlear implantation between 2012 and 2024. Preoperative and postoperative demographic and audiometric data, operative details, postoperative therapy, and outcomes were assessed using hearing-specific quality of life measures (SSQ-12 and CIQOL-10 Global) and a subjective Likert scale of satisfaction. Outcomes were statistically compared. The cohort included 50 patients (31 male, 19 female), with a mean deafness onset age of 33.8 years and a mean duration of 4.48 years. About 48% had been deaf for less than four years. The VERIA technique was used in 86% of implantations, with no immediate postoperative complications. Later, 2% experienced moderate dizziness/vertigo and tinnitus. The mean SSQ-12 score was 63.96, and the mean CIQOL score was 53.29. Overall, 84% were satisfied with their post-implantation communication abilities. The VERIA technique is reliable for cochlear implantation in post lingually deaf adults. Cochlear implantation significantly improves the quality of life for these patients, enhancing their physical, mental, and social well-being. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-05110-y.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantLipreadingPost lingualQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID40071015
PMCPMC11890912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.