Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070953›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Machine learning to predict urine culture antibiotic sensitivities in the emergency department.

Johnathan M Sheele, Ronna L Campbell, Derick D Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolution of technology and disparities in antimicrobial stewardship: a narrative review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johnathan M SheeleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ronna L CampbellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Derick D JonesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections diagnosed in the emergency department. Treatment of UTIs is largely empiric because urine culture results are not rapidly available. Objectives: We examined whether machine learning could predict antibiotic sensitivities of the urine cultures by using only data available during the clinical encounter. Methods: We used extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to examine 62,963 emergency department patient encounters from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. All encounters included a urinalysis and urine culture. We included 1303 variables in the full model and examined 21 antibiotics. An antibiotic was characterized as Results: We predicted urine cultures to be sensitive vs intermediate or resistant with area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) values ranging from 70 % (for amikacin) to 90 % (for linezolid) (median, 82 %) when negative urine cultures were characterized as antibiotic susceptible. AUROCs were as follows: nitrofurantoin (84 %); trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (80 %); ciprofloxacin (85 %); levofloxacin (85 %); first-generation cephalosporins (84 %); and third-generation cephalosporins (80 %). When models excluded urine cultures with no bacterial growth, AUROCs ranged from 66 % (for ampicillin) to 87 % (for amikacin) (median, 74 %). When models included only patients diagnosed with a UTI plus bacteriuria (≥10,000 colony-forming units per mL in urine culture), AUROCs ranged from 63 % (for ampicillin) to 85 % (for tetracycline) (median, 74 %). Conclusion: XGBoost can predict bacteriuria antibiotic sensitivities.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceAntibiotic sensitivityArtificial intelligenceUrinalysisXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40070953
PMCPMC11894297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.