ArticleBalkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG2024
Delineation of Partial Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Pregnancy Losses.
Article in Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of coagulation index in thromboelastography for predicting early pregnancy loss in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Monogenic Findings in Early Pregnancy Loss: Whole-Exome Sequencing Study of Euploid Products of Conception.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2025Article
- Analysis of complex chromosomal structural variants through optical genome mapping integrated with karyotyping.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy loss (PL), particularly early pregnancy loss (EPL), is a prevalent reproductive complication, with approximately 15% of confirmed pregnancies affected. Chromosomal abnormalities are implicated in more than half of EPLs, with trisomies being the most prevalent. Partial abnormalities, including segmental deletions, duplications, and unbalanced translocations, are detected in up to 10% of EPL cases. This study focuses on the precise characterization of partial chromosomal abnormalities, previously identified by Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) analyses. By employing an array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), we analyzed 20 EPL samples, identifying 32 partial chromosomal abnormalities, including 18 deletions and 14 duplications, with an average size of 33.2 Mb. Notably, two abnormalities previously undetected by QF-PCR and MLPA were revealed (deletions in 7q36, and 1p36.32p36.31regions), emphasizing the necessity of high-resolution genomic tools. Chromosomes 1, 18, and 13 emerged as frequently involved, aligning with previous associations with recurrent pregnancy loss. Recurrent abnormalities were identified in six chromosomal regions, with chromosome 1p36.33-p36.32 exhibiting the highest frequency. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of recurrent regions highlighted disruptions in critical biological processes, including molecular binding, enzymatic activity, and cellular development. Many genes in these regions are linked to multisystem syndromes, suggesting their involvement in early embryonic development and pregnancy viability. Our findings underscore the complexity of EPL's genetic landscape, demonstrating that large CNVs, may disrupt multiple genes critical for development. Although, subtelo-meric MLPA reliably detects telomeric partial chromosomal abnormalities in EPLs, aCGH is essential for detection and precise characterization of all CNVs, thus enhancing diagnostic and counseling strategies in affected couples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.