ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Transfer learning-based hybrid VGG16-machine learning approach for heart disease detection with explainable artificial intelligence.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disease classification via interpretable machine learning based on multi-center routine coagulation test.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- An explainable dual-modal diagnostic model for coronary artery disease: a feature-gated approach using tongue and facial image features.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Machine learning techniques for improved prediction of cardiovascular diseases using integrated healthcare data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, making accurate early detection essential for effective treatment and management. This study introduces a novel hybrid machine-learning approach that combines transfer learning using the VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) with various machine-learning classifiers for heart disease detection. A conditional tabular generative adversarial network (CTGAN) was employed to generate synthetic data samples from actual datasets; these were evaluated using statistical metrics, correlation analysis, and domain expert assessments to ensure the quality of the synthetic datasets. The dataset comprises tabular data with 13 features, which are reshaped into an image-like format and resized to 224x224x3 to meet the input requirements of the VGG16 model. Feature extraction is performed using VGG16, and the extracted features are then fused with the original tabular data. This combined feature set is then used to train various machine learning models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and Decision Trees. Among these models, the VGG16-Random Forest hybrid achieved notable results across all evaluation metrics, including 92% accuracy, 91.3% precision, 92.2% recall, 91.82% specificity, 92.2% sensitivity, and 91.75% F1-score. The hybrid models were also evaluated using unseen datasets to assess the generalizability of the proposed approaches, with the VGG16-Random Forest combination showing relatively promising results. Additionally, explainability is integrated into the model using SHAP values, providing insights into the contribution of each feature to the model's predictions. This hybrid VGG16-ML approach demonstrates the potential for highly accurate and interpretable heart disease detection, offering valuable support in clinical decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.