ArticleOncology letters2025
Incidence and management of hepatic immune‑related adverse events in advanced urologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Hepatotoxicity Based on the Baseline Liver Function.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Steroid-Refractory Cholestatic Immune-Mediated Hepatitis Following Nivolumab Therapy in an Elderly Patient with Metastatic Melanoma: A Rare and Challenging Presentation.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence, characteristics and management of hepatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Data regarding the demographics, ICI regimens and hepatic irAEs from 213 patients with metastatic UC or metastatic RCC receiving ICIs between February 2018 and September 2023 at three tertiary medical centers (Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea; Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences Cancer Center, Busan, South Korea; Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea) in South Korea were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Hepatic irAEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and classified based on R value patterns. Among the 213 patients evaluated, 76 (35.6%) experienced at least one irAE, whereas 48 (22.5%) developed hepatic irAEs. The median onset time for hepatic irAEs was 6.5 weeks, with incidence rates being higher with combination therapies than with monotherapies (31.8 vs. 18.3%; P=0.014). Furthermore, 72.9 and 27.1% of the patients had grade 1-2 and 3-4 hepatic irAEs, respectively. The patterns of liver toxicity included cholestatic (35.4%), mixed (35.4%) and hepatocellular (29.2%). All patients with grade 1-2 hepatic irAE recovered with supportive treatment without ICI discontinuation or corticosteroids use. Among the 13 patients with grade ≥3 hepatic irAEs, 12 recovered with high-dose corticosteroids, while 1 died due to fulminant hepatitis. Hepatic irAEs are common in patients with advanced and metastatic urologic cancers who are treated with ICIs, particularly with combination therapies. Most cases have low-grade irAE that are manageable without ICI discontinuation; however, severe cases require prompt recognition and treatment with corticosteroids. These findings emphasize the importance of regular liver function monitoring and appropriate management strategies for hepatic irAEs in patients with urologic cancer receiving ICI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.