ArticleOncology letters2025
Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of cancer of unknown primary.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with cancer of unknown primary: results from a nationwide post-marketing surveillance in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a diagnosis that the primary lesion cannot be confirmed by a series of imaging, endoscopic and pathological examinations. The present study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with CUP. The present retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with malignancies confirmed as CUP using histopathology at the Oncology Department of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Shijiazhuang, China) from January 2009 to January 2021. Clinical and pathological data, genetic testing results, treatment modalities and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A total of 107 patients were included, with a mean age of 56.59 years. The median follow-up period was 48.8 months. Adenocarcinoma was the most common pathological type (38.3%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (31.8%) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (16.8%). The median OS was 28.4 months, with 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year OS rates of 68.2, 54.1, 48.4 and 42.3%, respectively. Imaging revealed that 31 patients (29%) had visceral metastases, and these patients had a significantly shorter median OS compared with those without visceral metastases (8.9 vs. 69 months; P=0.001). Patients who received local treatment (n=31; 29%) had significantly longer survival times than those who did not (69 vs. 17.9 months; P=0.009). Of the 107 patients, 101 (94.4%) received systemic treatment. The median OS times for different treatment groups were as follows: Chemotherapy alone, 28.4 months; chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents or targeted therapy, not reached; no chemotherapy, 8.0 months; and untreated, 9.4 months, with significant differences observed among the groups (P=0.008). The survival outcomes of patients with CUP varied based on the presence of visceral metastasis and the treatment modalities employed. Systemic treatments, particularly those incorporating targeted therapy, appear to have the potential to improve prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.