Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070738›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025

Comparing Nasal Splints and Quilting Sutures in Septoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mohammed A Alhejaily, Abdullah A Alhejaily, Abdulrahman G Alosaimi, Ahmad Bogari, Badi Aldosari

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of nasal retainer versus doyle nasal packing on postoperative comfort and complications following septorhinoplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  2. Clinical utility of additional non-absorbable nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammed A AlhejailyPrince Sultan Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0005-0943-4926
Abdullah A AlhejailyCollege of Medicine, University, Tabuk University, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman G AlosaimiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ohud Hospital, Medinah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad BogariFacial Plastic Surgery Fellow, Otorhinolaryngologist - Head and Neck Surgeon, King Saud University , 3654 Helmi Kutbi Street, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Badi AldosariDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, King Khaled Road, Riyadh, 11223 Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nasal packing post-septoplasty often leads to discomfort, breathing difficulties, and elevated infection risk. Alternative methods, such as intranasal splinting and quilting sutures, have been proposed to mitigate these issues. This study evaluates their effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain and complications. Methods: A comprehensive literature search for peer-reviewed original research articles was conducted via multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, ProQuest Central, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from inception to December 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool (RoB 2.0) was utilized to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. In addition, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the eligible observational studies. Data were then systematically extracted and thematically analyzed. Results: Ten comparative studies for 575 patients were included in this review. The analysis showed that quilting sutures significantly reduced postoperative pain compared to nasal splints (MD -2.247, 95% CI -3.273 to -1.221, Conclusion: Quilting sutures are preferable for reducing postoperative pain in septoplasty patients, with both interventions showing comparable rates of postoperative complications. This suggests a potential shift towards quilting sutures for a more comfortable postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

Nasal SplintQuilting SutureRhinoplastySeptoplastySuture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID40070738
PMCPMC11890816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.