Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070701›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Community Perceptions of Neonatal Infection in Uganda.

Phiona Nalubega, Agnes Ssali, Ritah Namugumya, Hannah G Davies, Mary Kyohere, Musa Sekikubo, Madeleine Cochet, Joseph Peacock, Philippa Musoke, Janet Seeley and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Phiona NalubegaMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3204-7474
Agnes SsaliMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-0411
Ritah NamugumyaMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Hannah G DaviesInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-0874
Mary KyohereMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Musa SekikuboDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-9650
Madeleine CochetInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0436-4843
Joseph PeacockInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-7377
Philippa MusokeMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Janet SeeleyMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-5272
Kirsty Le DoareMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-085X
PROGRESS Study Author Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated awareness of neonatal infections among a population of pregnant women and other community members in Kampala, Uganda. We explored perceived causes of neonatal infections and perceptions of appropriate treatments. Methods: We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 97 participants: 25 community leaders who took part in 3 FGDs, 12 pregnant women who took part in IDIs, and 60 pregnant women who took part in 8 FGDs, between November 2019 and October 2020. Data were analyzed thematically. This work formed part of the PROGRESS study, an observational cohort study undertaken in Kampala, Uganda, between November 2018 and April 2021. Results: Beliefs about causes, signs, symptoms, and treatment of infants with suspected infections impacted health-seeking behavior. Some illnesses were perceived to be caused by environmental factors while others were believed to have social or behavioral causes, such as the promiscuity of the male partner causing infections or the mother being bewitched. Local herbs and traditional remedies were the most preferred method of treatment and were commonly relied on to address various health issues rather than conventional medicines. Notably, no participant mentioned vaccines as a way of preventing infections. Conclusions: Pregnant women and community members' understanding of the causes and treatment of neonatal illnesses were diverse, including environmental, social-behavioral, and supernatural causes, while both conventional and traditional remedies were perceived as appropriate treatments and sought accordingly. Understanding community perceptions and practices around neonatal infections is key to improving neonatal health interventions and outcomes.

Indexed as

communitycultural factorsneonatal infectionperceptionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40070701
PMCPMC11891128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.