Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070669›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

High-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in extracranial cervical artery dissection.

Sai Shao, Guangbin Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sai ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Guangbin WangDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracranial cervical artery dissection (eCAD) is the second leading cause of stroke in young and middle-aged adults. Clinical management strategies for eCAD are continuously being explored and optimized, as revealed by the recently published CADISS and TREAT-CAD studies. The type of drug, dosage, and timing of administration can affect the regression of carotid artery dissection and the risk of recurrence of stroke. Based on imaging evidence, it is important to develop individualized treatment strategies for different risk groups. Currently, High-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (MR-VWI) technology has made significant progress in the qualitative diagnosis of eCAD, vascular lesion progression, and the assessment of recurring ischemic stroke risk. To better understand the pathogenesis and progression of eCAD using MR-VWI, a comprehensive review is presented here.

Indexed as

black bloodcervical artery dissectionintramural hematomaischemic strokevessel wall imaging

Identifiers

PMID40070669
PMCPMC11893369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.