ArticleCureus2025
Patients' Perceptions and Experiences With Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Facilitators and barriers to rehabilitation exercise adherence among patients after total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) of the hip and knee is becoming increasingly popular within the orthopedic community. Most evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of OJA has been gathered from the perspectives of surgeons and healthcare organizations. However, the success of these pathways also hinges on patients feeling safe and adequately prepared to return home. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives, experiences, and challenges during the preoperative phase, the day of surgery, and the postoperative phase of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Materials and methods Twelve patients who underwent outpatient THA or TKA and their informal caregivers participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, following the Grounded Theory approach. Results OJA was well received by patients, with 33% making a patient-driven decision to undergo the pathway, while the majority supported the idea following their surgeon's recommendation. Key areas for enhancing the patient experience included better preoperative education and expectation management, streamlined pathway logistics, and reassurance through robust intra- and extramural safety nets. Notably, 92% of patients indicated they would choose OJA again over an inpatient procedure if faced with the same decision. Conclusions Although patients were generally very satisfied with outpatient THA and TKA, the findings create scope to refine existing pathways further. Additionally, interview insights suggest potential improvements to patient selection criteria to identify suitable candidates for OJA better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.