Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070609›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Factors Influencing Patients' Choice of Public or Private Hospitals in Riyadh City: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Nada M Almosa, Wadi Alonazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nada M AlmosaRisk Management, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Wadi AlonaziHealth Adminstration, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTo address healthcare challenges in Saudi Arabia, such as quality, efficiency, and increasing healthcare demands, the healthcare sector is undergoing significant transformation under the Healthcare Transformation Program in both public and private sectors, aligned with Vision 2030 for the country. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing the preference of patients between public and private hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study. Primary data was collected using a 38-item self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included demographic data and patient perceptions of services, efficiency, cost, and hospital selection. The data was collected using convenience sampling from 600 participants living in Riyadh who have attended public or private hospitals. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (α=0.869), demonstrating strong internal consistency. Item-total correlations across domains were statistically significant (p<0.01), supporting validity. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test, were performed.

resultsThe majority of participants were Saudi nationals (577, 96.2%) and female (399, 66.5%). Participants' ages ranged from 20 to 40 years. More than half of the respondents (303, 50.5%) held a bachelor's degree, while 40.2% reported a monthly family income of 10,000-20,000 SR. Hospital selection (3.79±0.65) was the strongest factor influencing patient preferences. Services provided (2.68±0.65) and efficiency (3.06±0.67) received neutral responses, while the cost of treatment (2.56±0.66) was not a significant factor. Education significantly influenced preferences, with highly educated patients favoring private hospitals. Also, non-Saudi patients valued private hospitals for better cost-effectiveness and services.

conclusionsPrivate hospitals are perceived as superior by people living in Riyadh compared to public hospitals when it comes to service level and efficiency. Respondents did not feel that the indirect costs of using public hospitals were significant. It shows the lower cost of public hospitals remains an important attraction that encourages users to rely on public hospitals. Nevertheless, respondents justify the higher cost of private hospitals because of the superior service level. Availability of modern equipment in the hospital, the reputation of doctors employed by the hospitals, overall appearance and outlay of the hospital facilities, hygiene, and location are also important factors that influence their choice of the hospital.

Indexed as

healthcare costshealth serviceshospital selectionpatient choiceprivate and public hospitals

Identifiers

PMID40070609
PMCPMC11896010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.