ArticleJBMR plus2025
Most infants with prenatal osteogenesis imperfecta diagnosis and poor prognosis survive: experience of a quaternary care osteogenesis imperfecta center.
Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal osteogenesis imperfecta revealed by antenatal fractures: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical diagnosis and challenges in management of Osteogenesis Imperfecta in a resource-limited setting - A case report and review of literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Commentary on Quality Improvement Case Series: "Osteogenesis Imperfecta or Non-accidental Trauma".Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta is a genetic condition with improperly or inadequately produced Type I collagen. Manifestations include bowing deformities, fractures, hydrocephalus, respiratory insufficiency, and feeding difficulty. Moderate or severe OI is often diagnosed prenatally based on ultrasound findings and genetic testing may be labeled as lethal. Here, we present 18 infants with moderate to severely presenting OI who received neonatal care at a single center over a 5 yr period, 10 of which were delivered at our institution. All 18 infants survived to neonatal discharge, with 7 infants requiring respiratory support and 9 infants requiring feeding support at discharge. Through Fisher Exact Test, Mann-Whitney U Test and backward elimination regression, we do not observe that lethal or possibly lethal diagnoses prenatally were correlated with medically relevant outcomes such as need for respiratory support at discharge or need for feeding support at discharge. Sixteen of the eighteen individuals are alive, with a minority requiring either respiratory or feeding support. With a multidisciplinary team approach to neonatal care, outcomes may be optimized. Infants formerly diagnosed with lethal OI may survive. Given our findings, and lack of correlation of prenatal assessments with survival and other medical outcomes, we recommend all families be given the option to pursue medical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.