ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Comparative efficacy of advanced and traditional wound dressings in post-operative orthopaedic care for hip and knee surgeries: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06540040 (A Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy of Postoperative Dressing in the Prevention of Early Surgical Site Complication and Facilitation of Early Mobilization After Orthopaedic Surgeries on Hip and Knee), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy of Postoperative Dressing in the Prevention of Early Surgical Site Complication and Facilitation of Early Mobilization After Orthopaedic Surgeries on Hip and Knee
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three advanced dressings (Aquacel Ag®, Opsite® Post-Op, and Mepilex Border Post-Op®) versus traditional dressings in post-operative care for patients undergoing orthopaedic hip or knee surgeries. Methods: Conducted between August and December 2022 at a tertiary care orthopaedic centre, 314 patients were randomized into four groups. Group A received Aquacel Ag®, Group B received Opsite® Post-Op, Group C received Mepilex Border Post-Op®, and Group D received traditional dressings. The primary outcomes measured were pain levels during dressing changes, exudate management, patient comfort, nurses' ease of application and removal of the dressing, and surgical site complications. Multivariate analysis, including logistic regression, was performed to adjust for potential confounders (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06540040). Results: Mepilex Border Post-Op® (Group C) significantly outperformed other dressings in key areas. Pain levels during dressing changes were consistently lower in this group on Day 3 (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 6.0 ± 1.1 in the traditional dressing group, p = 0.002) and at day 7 & 14 as well. Exudate management was effective with Mepilex Border Post-Op®. Group C patients reported the highest comfort and mobility scores on a Likert scale with easy application and removal. Surgical site complications were minimal, with only 1.2 % of Group C patients affected by Day 14 compared to 9.8 % in Group D (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed that Mepilex Border Post-Op® significantly reduced surgical site complications and improved patient comfort, with adjusted odds ratios favouring this dressing over traditional options. Conclusion: Mepilex Border Post-Op® (a 4-layer hydrophilic foam dressing) demonstrated benefits in post-operative care, reducing pain and complications while improving patient comfort. Single centre design with a limited sample size of the present study limits the generalizability of our findings. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in broader clinical settings. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06540040.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.