ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025
Enhanced recovery after endoscopic sinus surgery: Establishing comprehensive protocols for improvement of perioperative patient care.
Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of nasal dressings and applications for postoperative management following sinus surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Different titration protocols in pain management after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Enhanced recovery after endoscopic sinus surgery: Establishing comprehensive protocols for improvement of perioperative patient care.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have not been widely implemented, and a critical review of ERAS recommendations and a comprehensive analysis of the supporting literature has not been undertaken. We describe an ESS ERAS protocol including key perioperative interventions for patients undergoing ESS and assess the available evidence. Data Sources: A search was conducted of all relevant ERAS literature in otorhinolaryngology, anesthesia, and surgery using Medline (via PubMed), and Scopus. Keywords included "endoscopic sinus surgery," "sinus surgery," "FESS," and "ESS" for each area of intervention. Where applicable, the authors considered high-level evidence for recommendations devised for patient cohorts in otorhinolaryngology not undergoing ESS, as well as cohorts undergoing surgical procedures for which ERAS protocols have been extensively evaluated. Methods: Studies received grades of "low," "moderate," or "high" quality evidence based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. Each intervention was subsequently assigned a grade of "strong," "weak," or "conditional" based on the available evidence. Results: Strong recommendations include comprehensive patient education and counseling, minimization of preoperative fasting, application of topical/local anesthetics and vasoconstrictors, use of total intravenous anesthesia, avoidance of pharyngeal packing, and use of postoperative nasal irrigation and multimodal analgesia. Conditional recommendations include antibiotic prophylaxis. Weak recommendations include perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, controlled hypotension, and use of postoperative nasal packing/dressing. Conclusion: A comprehensive ERAS protocol for ESS can include a variety of high yield, evidence-based interventions that would likely improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.