ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
A Single-Center Case-Control Study of Glaucoma Severity on Initial Presentation in Haitian Americans.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess relative glaucoma severity between Haitians and non-Haitians upon presentation to a tertiary referral practice using a retrospective case-control design. Patients and Methods: All Haitian descent patients were age- and zip code-matched with non-Haitian Hispanic American controls from a tertiary glaucoma service in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical and social vulnerability characteristics were analyzed for differences in functional and structural glaucoma deficits. Those who did not return after 1 year were considered lost to follow-up. Outcome measures included a comparison of blindness, glaucoma severity [visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss], and follow-up rates between groups. Results: At presentation, 95 Haitians had worse average mean deviation (MD) than controls in the better (-9.4 ± 9.8 vs -5.1 ± 6.4 dB, p < 0.02) and worse eyes (-12.7 ± 10.0 vs -7.3 ± 7.0 dB, p < 0.01). Haitians also had a greater percentage of functional blindness (22.4% vs 4.1%, p < 0.02) in the worse eye. RNFL thickness and loss to follow-up were similar between groups. Haitians were also less likely to have had a glaucoma surgery or laser prior to presentation than controls (p ≤ 0.009). In multivariable models, Haitian descent was associated with worse MD in the worse eye. Worse neighborhood area deprivation indices were associated with higher likelihood of loss to follow-up, but Haitian descent was not. Conclusion: Haitians had greater vision loss than controls despite similar exam findings. Higher burden of blindness and fewer prior procedures upon presentation may indicate a care disparity. Haitian patients may benefit from greater surveillance or earlier treatment for glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.