Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070363›Full record

SynthesisBiomolecules & biomedicine2025

Trends in noninvasive ocular nanoparticle drug delivery: A bibliometric analysis (2004-2023).

Dan Li, Qing Ye, Chao Li

Abstract readReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan LiSuzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medcine, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qing YeSuzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medcine, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chao LiSuzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medcine, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of research on noninvasive nanoparticle drug delivery systems for the transocular surface from 2004 to 2023. Relevant publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to map contributions by countries/regions, authors, institutions, journals, keywords, keyword clusters, and timeline trends. A total of 695 articles were analyzed, showing a steady year-by-year increase in publications. China, the United States, and Spain were the leading contributors. Among authors, Alvarez-Lorenzo, Carmen was the most prolific, while Chanhan, Anuj's work received the most citations among the top 10 prolific researchers. The International Journal of Pharmaceutics published the highest number of articles in this field, whereas the Journal of Controlled Release was the most frequently cited among the top 10 most productive journals. The University of Santiago de Compostela and the University of Florida were among the most active institutions in this research area. Keyword analysis identified recent key themes, such as controlled release, cell interaction, dry eye, mechanisms, gene expression, and ocular drug delivery. The growing interest in transocular surface nanoparticle drugs is driven by their advantages, including increased solubility, improved stability, reduced administration frequency, sustained therapeutic concentrations, enhanced corneal penetration, and prolonged ocular surface residence time.

Indexed as

BibliometricsDrug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemNanoparticlesAdministration, OphthalmicHumansNanoparticle Drug Delivery System

Identifiers

PMID40070363
PMCPMC12450095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.