Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070357›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

Locoregional infusion of EGFR806-CAR T cells for recurrent or refractory pediatric CNS tumors: Results of the completed BrainChild02 phase 1 clinical trial.

Juliane Gust, Bonnie L Cole, Rebecca Ronsley, Ashley L Wilson, Kristy Seidel, Jason Wendler, Sowmya Pattabhi, Christopher Brown, Stephanie D Rawlings-Rhea, Nadezhda Shtanukhina and 14 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for CAR-T cell delivery and efficacy in solid tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Juliane GustDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5679-1989
Bonnie L ColeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Seattle Children's/University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-1949
Rebecca RonsleyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ashley L WilsonSeattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kristy SeidelSeattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason WendlerSeattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sowmya PattabhiSeattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christopher BrownTherapeutic Cell Production Core, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephanie D Rawlings-RheaSeattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nadezhda ShtanukhinaSeattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Samuel R BrowdDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason S HauptmanDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Amy LeeDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jeffrey G OjemannDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Erin E CrottyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2362-695X
Sarah E S LearyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Francisco A PerezDepartment of Radiology, Seattle Children's/University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason N WrightDepartment of Radiology, Seattle Children's/University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Catherine M AlbertClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Navin PintoClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rebecca A GardnerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nicholas A VitanzaClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michael C JensenClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Julie R ParkClinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Prospective evaluation of barriers to patient referral and enrollment in emerging cellular therapy trials: determining methods and structure to improve equity in future trial designU01TR002487 · NCATS · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI PARK, JULIE R, RAMSEY, BONNIE W · 2018 to 2022
$7.2M
Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood CancerAmerican Association for Cancer ResearchCancer is a division of the Entertainment Industry FoundationNCATS NIH HHS U01TR002487St. Baldrick's Stand Up To Cancer Dream Team Translational Cancer Research SU2C-AACR-DT-27-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelapsed/refractory pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors have a poor prognosis. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly overexpressed, but EGFRvIII mutations are uncommon. To target these tumors, we used chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells with a binder based on mAb806 which recognizes ectopically expressed wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII.

methodsIn this open-label phase 1 clinical trial, patients aged 1-26 years with EGFR + CNS tumors received weekly infusions of 1-2.5 × 107 CAR T cells into the tumor resection bed or the lateral ventricle via an implanted catheter. No lymphodepletion was used.

resultsEleven patients were enrolled. Four (3 with high-grade glioma, 1 with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor) were treated and received 5-10 CAR T cell infusions without dose-limiting toxicities. The trial closed prior to reaching planned dose regimens. All treatment-related adverse events were no higher than CTCAE grade 2. The most common were headache and nausea. One patient had a grade 1 seizure, and 3 had new sensory changes, weakness and/or urinary changes (grades 1-2) that were possibly related to CAR T cell infusion. A total of 3 of the 4 treated patients had progressive disease. One patient with spinal cord diffuse midline glioma had progressive peritumoral edema that could not be conclusively attributed to either progression or pseudoprogression and was, therefore, defined as stable disease, followed by a complete response to subsequent chemotherapy.

conclusionsIntracranially infused EGFR806-CAR T cells were tolerable at tested doses, with the best response of stable disease. EGFR is a potentially useful target for cellular therapy against pediatric brain tumors, particularly high-grade gliomas.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMalePrognosisEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T cellCNS tumorEGFRlocoregionalpediatric

Identifiers

PMID40070357
PMCPMC12448881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.