Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070346›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2026

Examining the needs, outcomes and current treatment pathways of 2461 people with treatment-resistant depression: mixed-methods study.

Kiranpreet Gill, Danielle Hett, Max Carlish, Rebekah Amos, Ali Khatibi, Isabel Morales-Muñoz, Steven Marwaha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Improvements in health-related quality of life with esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kiranpreet Gill *Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3628-4234
Danielle Hett *The Barberry, National Centre for Mental Health, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-5409
Max CarlishInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rebekah AmosInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ali KhatibiInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Isabel Morales-MuñozInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-6768
Steven MarwahaInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0303-9942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial subset of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) experience treatment-resistant depression (TRD), typically defined as failure to respond to at least two sequential antidepressant trials at adequate dose and length.

aimsTo examine clinical and service-level associations of TRD, and the experiences of people with TRD and clinicians involved in their care within a large, diverse National Health Service trust in the UK.

methodThis mixed-methods study integrated quantitative analysis of electronic health records with thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. Chi-squared tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to assess associations between lines of antidepressant treatments and sociodemographic and clinical variables, and binary logistic regression was used to identify associations of TRD status.

resultsNearly half (48%) of MDD patients met TRD criteria, with 36.9% having trialled ≥4 antidepressant treatments. People with TRD had higher rates of recurrent depression (odds ratio = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.45,

conclusionsTRD is characterised by increasing mental and physical morbidity and functional decline, with individuals experiencing barriers to effective care. Improved pathways, service structures and more effective biological and psychological interventions are needed.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantMajor Depressive DisorderAdultAgedAnxiety DisordersComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomAntidepressive AgentsElectronic health recordsmajor depressive disordermixed methodstreatment pathwaytreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID40070346
PMCPMC12823348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.