ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Clinical Evaluation of ODIS-1 Orthodontic Operation and Image Quality of Digital Imaging System
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the rapid development of computer technology, the application of digital technology to the display and processing of medical images has become a common concern. In recent years, oral digital imaging technology has received more and more attention.
objectiveThis paper mainly aims at the ODIS-1 oral digital imaging system to analyze and study the image quality and image aims at the ODIS-1 oral digital imaging system to analyze and study the image quality and processing technology, of which X-ray imaging is indispensable.
methodsIn this paper, the ODIS-1 digital scanning technology is used to detect different types of dental tissues, and its application in diagnosing oral diseases is evaluated. This paper takes 320 inpatients as the research object and uses Kodak dental film to compare the image quality of different positions.
resultsIt is found that there is no significant difference in image quality between the maxillary anterior teeth and mandibular anterior teeth and the maxillary posterior teeth and mandibular posterior teeth (P>0.05); the image quality of maxillary anterior teeth, mandibular anterior teeth, and maxillary posterior teeth and mandibular teeth are significantly different (P<0.05); among the various positions of the ODIS-1 oral digital imaging system, the image quality of the anterior teeth area is the best, while the image quality of the maxillary posterior teeth area is the worst.
conclusionHowever, the system has a variety of image post-processing functions, which can adjust the brightness and contrast of the image arbitrarily, select the area of interest in the image according to the detection requirements, and perform local amplification, edge enhancement, and other technologies to make the image achieve the best effect. In the case of poor image quality, the clarity of the image can be further improved through image post-processing and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.