Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40070163›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2025

The deubiquitinase inhibitor WP1130 drives nuclear aggregation and reactivation of mutant p53 for selective cancer cell targeting.

Swapnil Oak, Onkar Karajgikar, Nikhil Gadewal, Prasad Sulkshane, Tripti Verma, Sanjay Gupta, Tanuja Teni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Swapnil OakCell and Tumor Biology Group, Teni Lab, Cancer Research Institute, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Navi Mumbai, India.
Onkar KarajgikarCell and Tumor Biology Group, Teni Lab, Cancer Research Institute, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Navi Mumbai, India.
Nikhil GadewalBioinformatics & Computational Biology Facility, Cancer Research Institute, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Prasad SulkshaneCell and Tumor Biology Group, Teni Lab, Cancer Research Institute, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Navi Mumbai, India.
Tripti VermaHomi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai, India.
Sanjay GuptaHomi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai, India.
Tanuja TeniCell and Tumor Biology Group, Teni Lab, Cancer Research Institute, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-4296

Funding

Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer 1/3(7)/2020/TMC/R&D-II/8828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in the TP53 gene may lead to the loss of its tumor suppressor function and the acquisition of oncogenic properties. The enhanced stability of mutant p53 (mutp53) is one of the pivotal factors for its oncogenic functions, rendering proteins implicated in mutp53 stabilization as promising targets for therapeutic intervention. Although deubiquitinases (DUBs) are commonly deregulated in various cancers, their specific impact on mutp53 stabilization remains largely unexplored. In this study, we demonstrated the involvement of DUBs-USP5 and USP9X in-enhancing mutp53 stability while revealing the effects of DUB inhibitor WP1130 in selectively destabilizing different p53 mutants in cancer cells of various origins. Mechanistically, WP1130 induced mutp53 ubiquitination and nuclear aggregation, resulting in its partitioning to the detergent-insoluble fraction. Moreover, combined treatment with the proteasome inhibitor augmented mutp53 accumulation in this fraction, indicating proteasomal degradation of these aggregates. Interestingly, WP1130 did not alter the stability or induce aggregation of WTp53 protein, suggesting its selective targeting of mutp53. Furthermore, WP1130 disrupted the interaction of mutp53 with HSP40 and HSP90 while promoting its association with ubiquitin ligase CHIP, thereby facilitating mutp53 destabilization. Notably, WP1130 reactivated mutp53 via induction of a wild-type-like p53 conformation, upregulating its downstream effectors and inducing apoptosis, possibly due to its targeted binding near the mutation site, as suggested by our in silico analysis. These findings highlight the roles of USP9X and USP5 in mutp53 stabilization and underscore the therapeutic potential of DUB inhibitor WP1130 for the selective targeting of mutp53-expressing cancer cells.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDeubiquitinating EnzymesNeoplasmsPyridinesTumor Suppressor Protein p53Cell Line, TumorCyanoacrylatesHumansMutationPiperidonesProtein AggregatesProtein StabilityUbiquitinationUbiquitin Thiolesterase3,5-bis((4-nitrophenyl)methylidene)-1-prop-2-enoylpiperidin-4-oneCyanoacrylatesDeubiquitinating EnzymesPiperidonesProtein AggregatesPyridinesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin ThiolesteraseUSP9X protein, humandeubiquitinase inhibitordeubiquitinasesp53 stabilityreactivationWP1130

Identifiers

PMID40070163
PMCPMC12138167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.