Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Comparative Analysis of 5 cmH₂O Versus 10 cmH₂O PEEP on Cerebral Oxygen Saturation in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of lung-protective ventilation in neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main concern regarding lung-protective ventilation strategies during neurosurgery is the reduction in venous return and increase in cerebral blood flow when using high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the changes in regional cerebral oxygen saturations (rSO2) during the use of 5 cmH₂O and 10 cmH₂O PEEP in patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was designed as a prospective, single-blind randomized controlled study. Patients aged between 18 and 70 years, scheduled for an elective craniotomy for tumor resection, were divided into 2 groups: 5 cmH₂O PEEP (Group Low PEEP) and 10 cmH₂O PEEP (Group High PEEP). The PEEP was applied during general anesthesia, for controlled mechanical ventilation. The main outcome was the measurement of rSO2 before dura opening. Changes in rSO₂, hemodynamic parameters, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) during different periods of surgery were compared between the groups. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were included. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding demographic data. Mean arterial blood pressure and changes in SpO₂ were statistically similar in all periods between the groups (P=0.141 and P=0.081). When compared with the baseline value, SpO₂ increased significantly at all measurement times (P<0.05). No difference was observed in rSO₂ values compared with baseline rSO₂ values between the groups (P=0.218). CONCLUSIONS PEEP at the level of 10 cmH₂O can be safely applied during craniotomy without altering hemodynamics, and without causing a decrease in rSO₂.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.