ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Causal association between metabolic syndrome and ovarian dysfunction: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Triglycerides and ovarian response in diminished ovarian reserve: a two-sample mendelian randomization and clinical mediation study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and ovarian dysfunction has been widely reported in observational studies, yet it remains not fully understood. This study employs genetic prediction methods and utilizes summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to investigate this causal link.
methodsWe employed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis utilizing MetS and ovarian dysfunction summary data from GWAS. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) was employed as the primary MR method, supplemented by Weighted Median, Weighted Mode, and MR-Egger methods. The robustness of the results was further assessed through sensitivity analyses including MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out test.
resultsOur MR analysis identified a causal relationship between genetically determined insulin resistance (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.89, P = 0.03), waist circumference (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.45-3.15, P < 0.001), BMI (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.56-2.83, P < 0.001) and ovarian dysfunction. Conversely, reverse MR analysis confirmed causal effects of ovarian dysfunction on metabolic syndrome (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, P < 0.001) and waist circumference (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, P = 0.02). The results of MR-Egger regression test indicated that the whole analysis was not affected by horizontal pleiotropy. Additionally, the MR-PRESSO test identified outliers in SNPs, but after removal of outliers, results remained unchanged.
conclusionThis study reveals a bidirectional causal connection between metabolic syndrome and ovarian dysfunction via genetic prediction methods. These findings are crucial for advancing our understanding of the interactions between these conditions and developing strategies for prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.