ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Incidental mishaps and learning curves during free fibula reconstruction of mandible: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFree fibula reconstruction of the mandible has been the gold standard for reconstruction of mandible owing to its rich periosteal and peroneal blood vessel supply. This demands a multidisciplinary approach of maxillofacial and plastic surgeons. Meticulous presurgical planning of harvesting fibula, resection of diseased bone, contouring the fibula to the created defect to restore the anatomy and function, microvascular anastomosis, and postoperative medical care are vital for the survival of the flap. CASE SERIES: We report a series of cases in four Indian patients. Case 1 involves a 23-year-old male individual, Case 2 involves a 47-year-old male individual, Case 3 involves a 23-year-old male individual, and Case 4 involves a 56-year-old female individual. All patients underwent fibula reconstruction of the mandible post-odontogenic and malignant tumor resections with incidental intraoperative mishaps and management with successful outcomes with a follow-up of 12 months.
resultsAll the above cases were done with a multidisciplinary approach, including plastic and maxillofacial surgeons. Despite the incidental mishaps, it was a learning experience for the betterment of the planning of future cases.
conclusionAlthough the free fibula flap is a conventional method for reconstruction, there is a risk of error hidden in each of its subtle steps that can contribute to flap failure. Therefore, meticulous surgical planning is mandatory for execution of the treatment plan. Although complications are inevitable, they should not overshadow the learning opportunities from each respective case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.