Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40069865›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

PrOsteoporosis: predicting osteoporosis risk using NHANES data and machine learning approach.

Zebing Si, Di Zhang, Huajun Wang, Xiaofei Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emerging applications of feature selection in osteoporosis research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision support.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zebing SiDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Di ZhangCountry College of information science and engineering, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Huajun WangDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Xiaofei ZhengDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. szb520zd@163.com.

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Education Science Planning Project 2021GXJK366Shaoguan City Science and Technology Project 220601224532885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOsteoporosis, prevalent among the elderly population, is primarily diagnosed through bone mineral density (BMD) testing, which has limitations in early detection. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning approach for osteoporosis identification by integrating demographic data, laboratory and questionnaire data, offering a more practical and effective screening alternative.

methodsIn this study, data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed to explore factors linked to osteoporosis. After cleaning, 8766 participants with 223 variables were studied. Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and SelectKBest were employed to select the import features. Four Machine learning algorithms (RF, NN, LightGBM and XGBoost.) were applied to examine osteoporosis, with performance comparisons made. Data balancing was done using SMOTE, and metrics like F1 score, and AUC were evaluated for each algorithm.

resultsThe LightGBM model outperformed others with an F1 score of 0.914, an MCC of 0.831, and an AUC of 0.970 on the training set. On the test set, it achieved an F1 score of 0.912, an MCC of 0.826, and an AUC of 0.972. Top predictors for osteoporosis were height, age, and sex.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models in assessing an individual's risk of developing osteoporosis, a condition that significantly impacts quality of life and imposes substantial healthcare costs. The superior performance of the LightGBM model suggests a promising tool for early detection and personalized prevention strategies. Importantly, identifying height, age, and sex as top predictors offers critical insights into the demographic and physiological factors that clinicians should consider when evaluating patients' risk profiles.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNutrition SurveysOsteoporosisAdultAgedAlgorithmsBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited StatesMachine learningModelOsteoporosisRisk

Identifiers

PMID40069865
PMCPMC11899459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.